![instapaper highlights instapaper highlights](https://images.techhive.com/images/article/2014/05/instapaper-100268187-orig.png)
In other words, time is a potent filter.īut which of the many "read it later" apps should you use? We heartily recommend Instapaper. This is because disposable clickbait quickly loses its appeal while high-quality content tends to maintain its luster. More importantly, and more subtly, read it later apps naturally filter out low-quality articles. The simple practice of deferring the decision to read satisfies the immediate desire to snack. These apps enable you to send articles to a central depository where you can choose to deliberately read them later rather than impulsively reading them on the spot. One killer technique is to use a "read it later" app such as Instapaper, Pocket, Refind, et al. So how can you stop reading junk articles and start reading higher quality content? But cumulatively, over time, consistent snacking leads to undesired effects. Reading a clickbaity article here or there probably won't corrupt your mind, just like a handful of M&Ms now and again probably won't cause diabetes.
![instapaper highlights instapaper highlights](http://www.markwk.com/generated/images/2019-resources/ifttt-article-tracking-instapaper-800-66dea3e36.jpg)
Thinly veiled "content marketing" that touches on maybe one useful insight before arriving at the self-interested call-to-action. Medium posts about self-actualization consumed exclusively by Medium writers who post about self-actualization ( Stop Trying to Find Yourself Create Yourself Instead) or, Unfortunately, the same can now be said for articles on the internet, with most web content falling into one of the following buckets:Ĭomplete nonsense disguised by a clickbaity headline and an irresistible cover photo ( Man Tries to Hug a Wild Lion, You Won't Believe What Happens Next!) There are such things as healthy snacks, but as we all know, they're typically junk food by design - mass-produced, dopamine-inducing, heavily-marketed quick fixes. To continue this analogy, if books are meals, then articles are snacks.
![instapaper highlights instapaper highlights](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/staticinstapaper/blog/Comment_Creating.png)
In the same way that you want to nourish your body with only high-quality, nutritious foods, you also want to feed your mind with only high-quality, thoughtful content. It turns out, the same is true for reading: You are what you read. Or, if you have the plain text (again, something any Project Gutenberg-type book would have), you could import the whole text into a notes/wiki/research app like Roam directly.When it comes to eating healthily, we've all heard the saying: You are what you eat. With older texts, though, or indie books sold as PDFs, MarginNote and LiquidText both are far more useful since you can highlight the text directly where you manage bookmarks. I've tried putting quotes from paper books in Roam to link together, and that's worked generally well so far-with the same caveat as with Kindle, you need to open the book to find the context later. Would love to see Kindle be a more open platform, and/or for Amazon to build more research tools into it. But then the problem is that the highlights are delinked from the original text, thus you'd have to open Kindle and find the highlight to fully connect the dots. The biggest problem I have with highlights is that I read Kindle eBooks, highlight in-app, then need to get the highlights out of Kindle and into another app if you want to organize all highlights/annotations together. Interesting challenge, though one that may be easier to solve with classic texts than newer books.